Okay! Speaking E-Prime for a whole week can be harder than one might think! Yes, it may be! Or maybe it really is!
"To Be" in Their Bonnets
A matter of semantics
A few days ago I opened up a recent issue (Volume 48, Number 2) of Et cetera,
the quarterly journal of the International Society for General
Semantics, and within a few minutes of doing so got a bit of a surprise.
The surprise came from an article by Emory Menefee, a former president
of the ISGS, which bluntly calls into question attempts by many society
members to promote something called E-Prime, a form of English that has
for years ranked extremely high among the interests of the
general-semantics community. Advocates of E-Prime, for reasons I'll come
to, favor the elimination in English of every form of the verb "to be"—be, been, is, am, are, was, were, 'm, 's, 're,
and all the rest. They not only promote E-Prime as a theoretical
proposition but also try in daily life to erase to be and its
inflections from everything they write. The most committed advocates use
E-Prime even when they talk. Given all this, to see the E-Prime
endeavor criticized in an official organ— to see that endeavor, indeed,
termed "quixotic"—naturally raised an eyebrow. When I queried the
International Society for General Semantics about the matter, the
executive director, Paul Dennithorne Johnston, assured me that the
society never did, and does not now, regard E-Prime as tantamount to
some sort of "party line." Well, fine. But it has strong support among
the nomenklatura, and I do not expect them to hold their peace.